AIAI Infrastructure Map
CompaniesInsightsMapsCompareNewsletterWatchlistStrategy

Technology comparison

CPO vs Pluggable Optics

A technology comparison of co-packaged optics and pluggable optics for AI data center networks.

Research fieldCPOPluggable Optics
What it isOptics placed closer to switching silicon, often discussed as a way to improve bandwidth density and power efficiency.Replaceable optical modules inserted into switch or server ports.
Why it mattersCould reduce electrical trace distance and power per bit as switch bandwidth increases.Keeps serviceability, vendor flexibility, and operational familiarity.
Where it is usedFuture high-radix switches and advanced systems; adoption remains uncertain.Common in today and near-term data center optical networks.
Pros
  • Potential power efficiency
  • Higher integration
  • Bandwidth density
  • Serviceable
  • Flexible supply chain
  • Familiar operations
Cons
  • Serviceability complexity
  • Manufacturing risk
  • Ecosystem readiness
  • Power and front-panel constraints at extreme bandwidth
  • Longer electrical paths
Key companies
  • Broadcom
  • Marvell Technology
  • POET Technologies
  • Coherent
  • Lumentum
  • Coherent
  • Applied Optoelectronics
  • Fabrinet
Adoption uncertaintyHigh. Timing depends on system design, reliability, and operator comfort.Lower near term, though bandwidth scaling can pressure the form factor.

Key Companies

Lumentum

LITE · Public · United States

Medium risk

Optical component and laser supplier with relevance to high-speed data center connectivity and photonics roadmaps.

4/5

Related Articles